Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:05 PM 22-03-98 -0500, B.D. wrote: >One of the most refreshing things about this list has been the utter lack >of flaming, until I apparantly foolishly asked the question about UV filters. > >Now, would someone out there have the kindness to tell me whether, in the >real world, where images are being blow up to 11x14 on rare occassion, and >more normally are in the 5x7 to 8x10 range, whether the image degredation >caused by a good quality UV filter outweighs the peace of mind of having >full-time protection for a piece of glass in the 800-1500 range? [snip] You were just in the unfortunate position of asking a question that just a month or 2 ago was a raging storm on the list. Some poeple say that you should only use filters when you need to filter the light, that a lens hood is protection enough for the front lens element which has a hard coating, in any case. Others say use them always to protect the lens. Under certain lighting conditions, filters may contribute towards flare in the picture. In my personal opinion, I sleep better at night knowing that I have a litle protection on my multi-thousand dollar lenses. Maybe I am crazy, maybe not. But I have never seen with and without filter comparisons that demonstrate the detrimental effects of filters. I think that everyone will agree that for most situations, an UV filter will have no noticeable effect on the photograph. Dan C.