Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was reading the LA Times the other day..... The Supreme Court has passed a ruling on the legality of Grey Market Imports. I am no lawyer, but my interpertation is that the right to trademark protection is limited to the first sale of a product. ie, you must buy a legally made garment from the legal owner of a trademark. After this first sale, there is NO trademark protection for importation to subsequent trademark owners..... let me explain.... The old trademark law gave the trademark owner the EXCLUSIVE right to import goods. The official importer would have other cameras defaced to remove the trademark or simply have US Customs pick up the merchandise and destroy it. This has now legally been overthrown. The effect of this ruling is that there will be more grey market stuff available..... more freely. The reaction to this from the official importers is already heard on the Nikon (List) front.... Nikon USA refuses to repair (in warranty or out of warrant ,,, it maks no difference) a camera that was not bought in the USA or to which you do not have a purchase receipt from a foreign country, even if you are willing to pay the repair charges..... so what do you do with a second hand camera? This will be an interesting policy to follow, as we have had several discussions on Leica repair policies and warranties. Any comments from our LUG Lawyers? Thank You Remove "ZZ" form auto reply address or please reply to address below: Frank Filippone red735i@worldnet.att.net