Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] contax g2 lenses - comparable to Leica M?
From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 17:08:22 -0800

Thanks!  I went to my local dealer today (where I have spent over $10,000
in the
past year alone) and he gave me a G2, 28, 45, and 90 to play with for a few
days.  What a cool guy!  I'll report how it compares to my R8 and R lenses.

At 06:25 PM 3/6/98 -0500, John Brubaker wrote:
>Francesco - I have the G2 and Zeiss 21mm, 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm.  They are
>all superb lenses - very comparable to Leica's optics.  The G2 camera is so
>different from the "M" series cameras, that you really shouldn't compare
>them.  I like the Contax "G" cameras.  but many people don't - it's a
>personal thing.  You need to live with the camera and use it for awhile to
>become comfortable with it.  - JB.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Five Senses
>> Productions
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 4:20 PM
>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>> Subject: [Leica] contax g2 lenses - comparable to Leica M?
>>
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the Contax G2.
>> It seems to be a very cool little unit, and I understand that the Zeiss
>> lenses are equal in quality to the Leica M lenses.  It seems that
>> Contax has taken care of the frames problem and parallax.  They have
>> also developed AF for their rangefinder before Leica.  Any opinions
>> on the Zeiss T* lenses?  It is the lens that makes the image, not
>> the body, so I wonder if anyone has seen results from the G2.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Francesco Sanfilippo,
>> Five Senses Productions
>> webmaster@5senses.com
>>
>http://www.5senses.com/
> 


Francesco Sanfilippo,
Five Senses Productions
webmaster@5senses.com


http://www.5senses.com/