Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Must be a new lens. Maybe the ROM problem?!? - ---"Fantoni, Ernesto" <Fantoni@PHIBRED.COM> wrote: > > Marco, > > look at the Leica catalog. Vario Elmar 80-200 f4! > > > ---------- > > From: Marco Grande[SMTP:hektor73@yahoo.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 04 March, 1998 8:09 AM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Vario Elmar 80/200 f4 Vs leicaflex SL > > > > > > Guido, > > 80/200 f4? I did not know such a lens exists. > > The original 1974 Vario-Elmar-R 80-200 f4.5 was one if the three early > > R lenses (the other two being the 24/2.8 and 16/2.8 fisheye) > > incompatible with the Leicaflex and SL. The mirror assembly is > > slightly different in the SL2 et seq. > > > > Is this the lens to which you refer? > > The later 75-200/4.5 and 70-210/4 lenses should woork on an SL. > > > > MG > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com