Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 01:15 PM 24-02-98 -0800, Jim asked: >Hi Folks, > >I have a question. Actually a couple of questions. > >Is there any performance differences between the 1st (two ASPH elements) >and the 2nd (one ASPH element) 35/1.4 M lenses? > >And, > >Why is the first version commanding such a hefty price? I would doubt that there is any noticeable differences between the two versions. Since I own the first version, I would be more than amenable to do a test with someone who owned the second version, to see how they compared. As far as the price is concerned, supposedly there were only 2000 made, and in fact part of the folklore associated with this lens states that many of the lenses were rejected due to quality control problems, so that the actual existing samples is closer to 1500. Some more folklore (take with large grain of salt): - -the aspheric elements were ground by an elderly workman in the plant who was the last one who had the knowhow to make them. - -the aspheric elements were made as a personal project by TWO elderly workman in the plant, and were discovered (in their lockers) when they retired. Leica then designed a lens around them (this is my favourite!). There were just enough elements for 2000 lenses. I'm sure that Erwin will have a totally mundane explanation for the REAL production of the lens. Dan C.