Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]OK folks, if Leica sales are on the decline, can the LUG make meaningful suggestions to increase sales and marketability and so save the company? I think we can. Whether Solms is willing to act on them is entirely a different matter. Although I am sure many of you will come up with better ideas, these are mine: 1) Produce Leica R lenses in Canon EOS and Nikon manual focus mounts. As I understand it, Leica makes more profit in lenses than bodies. Leica glass on Nikon and Canon would increase lens production at least 10 fold IMHO, probably a great deal more. This one change could easily bring Leica back to flourishing profitability all by itself. No doubt there is probably some sort of license fee involved. Whatever the obstacles, they need to be overcome and the new mounts need to be in production to quickly get Leica back on a profitable track. While other mounts like Minolta and Pentax might be added later, it makes no sense to produce Leica lenses in mounts with relatively small customer bases such as Olympus or Contax. Besides, Contax already has Zeiss lenses. It isn't something new for a major manufacturer to produce lenses for other mounts. Zeiss also makes Hassy and Rollei lenses. Nikon made Bronica and LTM lenses. If Pride is a factor to not making Canon and Nikon mount lenses, it needs to be put aside for Leica to survive and flourish. While it might be argued that this move could mean the end of the R system, that really wouldn't be much of a loss if you have the same optics on Canon or Nikon bodies. 2) Completely revamp the dealer sales rep network, while at the same time giving them the support and backup they need to do absolutely the best job. I've been told that something like 60% of US Leica sales come from only two dealers, B&H in NY and Camera World in Oregon. While they get great service from Leica, many other Leica dealers I have talked to feel pretty much left out of the loop. They are afraid to complain because then it might even get worse. Presumably if Solms would allow this to happen in a large market like the US, other dealer networks are getting less than stellar service as well. Recently a Leica dealer told me that the new M6 HM would arrive in "Leica Time." "Like A Week, Like a Month, Like a Year." Confidence in whatever the sales reps say is pretty much nil because the dealers have been let down so much. He added "Sometimes the truth hurts." ALL Leica dealers need to be given the same, GREAT service by their sales reps. This alone could double US sales as dealers start pushing a product that they are more confident will be backed up. 3) New Advertising Campaign In the US Leica is suffering an identity crises among the rank and file photog. Say "Leica" and many will give you a blank look and reply "Like a what?" Running ads about the new improved R8 or M6 HP will not get many new converts because they don't know what a Leica is to begin with. They have probably never seen one, much less held one. I suggest a three pronged ad campaign needs to replace the standard ineffective "New & Improved" ads Leica has run for so long. The First is a "Leica Challenge" where photogs take their favorite camera into the camera shop. The Leica Salesman gives them a 24 exposure roll of BLACK & WHITE 400 ASA film. 12 shots are taken inside the shop with the Leica, the film rewound leader out, and then the remaining shots with the photogs camera. The film is processed on the spot. People will be amazed at the difference. The Second is a "Hall of Fame" endorsement by the legends of photography. HCB, Eisenstaedt (he will probably come back for this campaign, but if not it could be handled by his estate), Capa etc. The best of the best. A recommendation by anything less than a super star is useless. Reading "Joe Smoe" that you have never heard of likes Leica, is a complete waste of advertising dollars, regardless of how good they are. This will also build upon the romance and interest of photo journalism. Remember how Ansel Adams increased interest in Large Format? Super star photogs can do it for Leica too. The Third is a slogan campaign that is repeated so often it becomes part of Leica. One possibility is "Leica, when you demand the best." OK, so perhaps I am exaggerating, but hopefully it will be true again. 4) Double funding for Quality Control. Someplace in Solms is a bean counter (s) who believes it more cost effective to cut costs in quality control and inspection and then deal with the inevitable returns, than to do it right the first time. That SOB (s) badly needs to be FIRED. It's a joke, and a bad one at that, for Leica to pretend it's the best when it's turning out shoddy quality control. Enough said. 5) Double the size of the repair staff and its competency. Horror stories of four to six week repairs are common. There is really no reason why a world class camera company should be run this way--into the ground. Maximum turn around should be two weeks, with a one week not unusual. Then there is the question of competency. A friend of mine bought a black M2. It was his first, and he was very proud of it. It needed a shutter overhaul, so he asked me who to send it to. I recommended a local repairman who would have done a great job within two weeks. Well, he wanted it done "right" and was willing to pay the bill. So off to Leica's repairmen in NY. 8 weeks later he gets it back, at over double the price he could have paid locally. There was just one small problem. The elves in NY had substituted nice new shiny chrome screws for the ugly old black enamel screws his M2 should have. No prob he thought, just send it back and get the right ones. Surprise! They don't have them. If you are no familiar with it, chrome screws on a black enamel camera greatly lower it's value and salability, as well as looking like hell. And to think he paid Leica to screw up his camera. That was several months ago, and he has still not been able to resolve the problem. As far as I am concerned, the proper screws should be taken out of display models in the Leica museum and his repair bill should be refunded for his trouble. 6) Lower the price of R8 and M6 bodies to sell the lenses and accessories. Sell the bodies at cost to get people into the system. It keeps your factory employed and will pay off in the long run. 7) Move back into a restored Wetzlar factory and change the company name back to Leitz. The phrase "Leitz Wetzlar" is worth hundreds of millions in product recognition, tradition, and trust. That it was thrown away uselessly is one of the greatest all time mistakes in marketing and trademark value. OK, so Leitz sold the business. Bring one or more back on the Board. Give them stock. Do whatever is necessary to bring back the Leitz name in the old Wetzlar factory. It's the greatest tradition in photography. WHATEVER THE COST, it will be a great bargain. The company that became Exxon spent something like $10,000,000 just to CHOOSE the name, and then another $50,000,000 to make the changeover. My recollection of the figures probably aren't right, but it was a HUGE sum just for a name change. Product identification and trust is all important. That the phrase "Leitz Wetzlar" would be thrown away just points out the bad management of the present company. 8) Stop prostituting the Leica name with meaningless commemoratives and "Leica" souvenir products. Leica is about excellence, not suspenders or gimmicks or "Royal Danish Weddings." It's embarrassing to many Leica lovers that the present Solms regime would be so out of touch with their product, their tradition, and their customers that they would stoop to this. 9) Return tradition to the M line with engraved top plates and black enamel finishes. These features make for a BEAUTIFUL camera, and that is also a lot of what Leica is about, though the thought has certainly been lost at Solms. This might seem like a simple thing, but it is VERY important to many customers, especially in the Asian marketplace where sales are lagging now. BTW more people should consider the titanium body IMHO. Much better finish than the current black or chrome. 10) Considering past history, even if the absolute best suggestions (whatever they are) to increase Leica market share and profits were posted on the LUG, I really doubt if any of them would be adapted by the Solm elves. Unfortunately, it is more likely Solms will stay the present course and keep Leica floundering with more of the same old problems, wondering what is wrong, until they eventually run out of money and are bought out. The up side is that new management and ownership might improve things a lot. Regards, Stephen Gandy