Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 09:24 PM 13-02-98 +0100, Irwin replied to: > >>[snip] But when its features >>are compared in a checklist with other cameras, it LOOKS obsolete. If it >>never existed, no designer in his/her right mind would propose such a >>camera. Its success depends much on its history. > >I do not think that comparing the list of features of any object to another >one can give you any clue of which product is 'obsolete'. If you look at a >simple tools like a hammer (in existence for many years) or a pencil or a >brush, one might be inclined to state that its features are substandard >compared to whatever you wish.[snip] Of course, you are right. Note that I emphasized the word LOOK in my original paragraph. I don't think the M6 actually IS obsolete. You mentioned the "very mythical" M9. Is this the same as the "not so mythical" M8 or the "marginally mythical" M7? Dan C.