Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens information request from a Leica lover on a budget
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:57:04 -0500

Bud,
I saw a film where a guy named Pearson was trying to bag a grizzly with a
bow and arrow. I was amazed that the man filming the event didn't run when
the man missed; from that point, I figured the best way to get a picture of
a grizzly was to pay someone else to do it! I glad to know that there are
still a few of these hardy souls that have escaped the food chain!
Cheers,
Dan'l
dwpost@msn.com
- -----Original Message-----
From: Bud Cook <budcook@ibm.net>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 1998 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens information request from a Leica lover on
a budget

>James,
>I've used the 2X Extender for the SL/SL-2 for some time.  Of course it's
>biggest drawback is the loss of 2 f-stops.
>Using the Extender with the 180mm f2.8 ElmaritR would give you a good deal
>of flexibility and excellent results.  I used this combination in Alaska
>with Kodachrome 200 and was quite happy that I didn't have to lug around a
>huge telephoto for the few times I needed to be isolated from dangerous
game
>(grizzly bears).
>Use a tripod and stop down a bit, if possible.
>Bud Cook
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Burris <jabu@direct.ca>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Date: Monday, February 09, 1998 11:22 PM
>Subject: [Leica] Leica R lens information request from a Leica lover on a
>budget
>
>
>>I am considering a few lenses to add to my fledgling Leica R system.  I
>>would like to know, based on the experience of all you R users out there,
>>how these lenses stack up against one another.
>>
>>1. 21 f4   vs  older 19 f2.8
>>
>>
>>2. older 250 f4 (my preferred focal length)  vs  older  180 f2.8
>>
>> -Or should I scrap it & keep saving for the 180 f3.4 (ie is the APO
>>         noticably sharper at every aperature)?
>>
>> -If anyone has had experience with the Leica 2x teles I would like to
>>           know if the older model is worth consideration.
>>
>>
>>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>>James
>>
>