Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Duane - It is possible to minimize grain in an 8" x 10" print by first printing small, then making copy negatives to print your final prints from. The trick is to make the copy negs on 4" x 5" film, so the grain in the prints isn't enlarged much. Of course, the down side is that sharpness and resolution is lost through this copy proceedure. - JB. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of BIRKEY, > DUANE > Sent: Friday, February 06, 1998 3:24 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] RE: Ted shaking our heads to pulp > > > Ted wrote > > >He used Kodak 3200 at that speed and sometimes 6400. Developed the > film > >himself and then took it and had 4X6 B&W prints made at his local 1 > hour > >shop! > > >I know it sounds crazy already, but hear it out! It gets wilder! :) > > >When the prints are made 4X6 they don't show any grain! Now you edit > and > >take the very best and copy them onto Tmax 100 film fine grain stuff. > And > >make your almost grainless 8X10's from the copies! Now I know you are > going > >to be shaking your heads and brains to pulp. > > At first glance I'm a bit skeptical, since it just doesn't seem to > make logical sense. > > I looked at a few of my TMY B&W 3x5 prints with a Linhof 8x loupe and I > can see grain with or without the loupe. I suppose copying a low > resolution print softens the image enough that the grain doesn't appear > as sharp on the 8x10's and maybe the apparent sharpness was just OK in > the 8x10. > > But let's face it, if there is grain in the negative it will be in the > final print and in the same proportion to the rest of the image whether > you make copies or not. If you soften the grain you also soften the > image. When you duplicate images, you add more grain albeit different > grain and you lose some sharpness since photographic paper is > relatively a low resolution material. I suppose adding the Tmax 100 > grain over the other grain could cause it to break up the original > granular patterns more. I would test it before believing the process > to be true and I would want to see some side by side comparisons. I've > been wrong before. > > The other factor about grain is that it is invisible with true blacks > and true whites, and less visible when the subject is in sharp focus. > Some textured subjects hide grain as well. Out of focus medium and > light grays make grain stand out like a sore thumb. So shooting a high > contrast scene (or making a high contrast print) while maintaining the > subject in focus could nearly eliminate the appearance of grain. Don't > just take my word for it, look at some prints! > > Duane > >