Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>Since the DOF will be the same, with any lens, for the same image size, >>choose the 100mm APO Macro. It's one of the most outstanding lenses ever >>produced. >> >>Jim > >Jim: I know you as well as all users are very impressed with the 100mm f2.8 >apo macro lens. Question: I like my 90mm Summicron-R very much. Would it >make any sense to trade the f2 lens for the apo lens? Or do you see >justification for having both lenses? > > >Your comment on the 12585 vs. 12504 sunshades was very helpful. > >Regards, Andrew Jordan Andrew, If you are talking about Macro work, you cannot compare a 90/2 with a 100/2.8 . The 100 was made for exquisite macro results. Also to use the 90 for macro work, you will need extension tubes, which do not have auto diaphragm control. When I bought my 100, I sold my 90 and have never been sorry. I use my 100 more for normal work than macro work. It's an outstanding lens. You can definitely *see* the difference in the results between the 90 and 100. I would call the 100/2.8 APO the benchmark for other lenses to be compared against. IMHO, unless you need f/2 or need a lighter weight lens sometimes, I would not keep the 90. The difference between the focal lengths is nil. And the 100 is clearly the better lens (for macro and overall resolution L/MM). Jim