Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>I've never used the G2, so I can't give you an opinion about it. I hope our colleagues who are well acquainted with the G2 and its lenses would write a comparison opinion. Does it have the timbre of a 50mm f2 Summacron? That's the bottom line.<<< Bob, The July/August 1998 issue of _PHOTO Techniques_ will feature an article called "Street Shooting in the Orient: The Contax G2 and the Zen of Small Cameras." It compares the G2 extensively to the M6 and if all goes well, it should have two sidebars: one about the history of the G2 lens designs, and the other pitting the G2's 45/2 in a practical trial directly against three Leica lenses: the 50/2 Summicron, the 50/1.4 Summilux, and the 50/2.8 Elmar-M. The test is an objective trial involving 40 rolls of color neg and slide film rated "blind" by several professional observers at apertures from wide open to f/8. The author uses both camera systems. --Mike (Editor) >>>Some people dream of supermodels, others of riches. In my Dreams there is an electronic Japanese made body, with a built-in quiet motor like an EOS A2, Matrix metering, Selectable Auto-bracketing and great matrix flash, and a 250th flash sync with a rangefinder as good as the M cameras. The dream comes here: It has an M mount and all my precious Leica glass fits perfectly. Go ahead, tell me what a loser I am<<< Hi Tom! We miss you over on CompuServe.... You're not a loser, but your plan has one slight flaw...you mean it has an _*R*_ mount and all your precious Leica glass fits perfectly. Half the M lenses have insufficient back focus to use on an SLR, and all of them have the wrong flange distance. --Mike