Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:16 PM 31-01-98 -0800, Jim Brick wrote: >Dan, > >If you have a UV filter on your lens 100% of the time, how do you know that >your 90 is prone to flare with or without a filter? Also, please tell us >how tree sap and other environmental "shit" manages to zero-in on only your >front lens element (filter in your case) ? [snip] Yes, in the future I will avoid replying to posts at 3 in the morning. At that time of day I get a bit overly worked up over dumb issues. My figure of 100% was rounded. I have in the past done tests without filters, usually at the same tine that I am testing a lens for sharpness etc. It is at these times that I have noticed no differences. As for tree sap, the stuff does seem to get all over the camera. I don't mind taking a cotton cloth to the body of my M6, I am just loath to do it with my lenses. I just have to look at my filters to see stuff that I am glad is not on my lens. I know, why don't I just clean it off the lens? Well, I prefer not to if I can help it. Someione else mentioned having comparison JPGs he is willing to email out. I may take him up on his offer. I guess my point is that if you prefer not using a filter, this is perfectly fine. And vice versa. One thing, if the day comes when I want to sell off some of my lenses, you can be sure there will be no cleaning marks! Dan C. ps. I think that most LUGers have seen enough of this thread. I'm afraid that Marvin will put me on his kill list!