Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alf, Thank you for defining something I've not been able to do adequately. I have a 50mm Rigid Summicron as well as many later Leitz (and other) lenses. There is something fascinating about Kodachrome transparencies taken with this lens and the 8 element 35mm Summicron that I've never been able to describe. I can go back over decades of slides and pick out those taken with this magical lens. If I were limited to one camera and one lens it would be my M3 w/50mm Rigid Summicron. Bud Cook - -----Original Message----- From: Alfred Breull <puma@hannover.sgh-net.de> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Sunday, January 25, 1998 4:51 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 mm M lens comparisons (long) >Tom: > >We are speaking about transparencies, ok?, since - whatever you >try in prints, it's washed away by the labs (in my experience). > >The difference in color impression between the rigid chrome Summicron >and the current version is as strong as the difference in color impression >from paintings in impressionism and expressionism. > >Since the current Summicron "agrees" in its color rendition to paintings >from the period of expressionism, you cannot show the transparent and >fragile presentation of light anymore: There's no "air" between the colors. > >Let's suppose you like to show the impression of blossoms floating/ >hovering (word ?) above a meadow (sorry, I don't have another example at >hand), then the current Summicron both, does not and cannot, show it >anymore, because it shows the green of the leaves too strong. The >transparency is gone, because there's no "air" between the colors >anymore. > >Usually, if you like to pronounce colors, you underexpose 1/3 or >1/2 of an f-stop, depending on the subject/object and type of film. >On the other hand, you cannot "soften" colors by overexposure, since >you loose the deepness in the shadows. > >So, although more sharp, the current Summicron has lost parts of its >abilities. > >Alf >-------------------------------------------------------------- >At 22:11 24.01.1998 EST, you wrote: >>In a message dated 98-01-24 20:41:57 EST, you write: >> >><< And, in color, the >> pictures from the current Summicron look like pictures of "Smarties" >> (red, green & blue children sweets), because the colors are >> over-pronounced. >> >> >> >>Alf >> >>Would you please explain this. How can colors be over-pronounced? Does this >>refer to too much color contrast? I do not understand how colors can be too >>saturated. >> >>Tom Shea >> > >