Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Summicron-M 50mm or Summilux-M 50mm?
From: TEAShea <TEAShea@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:29:02 EST

In a message dated 98-01-23 13:48:55 EST, you write:

<< Tests are not always quite clear on the 
 issue, although I get the impression that the Summicron often receives 
 better test results than the Summilux. >>

I recently did extensive searching on this and the results I found clearly
indicated that the Summicron is slightly better than the Summilux, perhaps
noticably so at f2 and f2.8.  Any advantage seems largely or completely gone
by f4.0.  Among commentators outside the Leica group, it seems that the
Summilux is not as highly regarded as the Summicron.  I have not used the
Summilux.  Test reports (to the extent they can be considered useful) indicate
that the Summilux is bettered by other 1.4 lenses including the Zeiss / Contax
1.4 and Canon 1.4.  

Tom Shea