Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test reports on Leica M and Contax G lenses?
From: Donal Philby <donalphilby@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:05:03 -0800

Lucien_vD@compuserve.com wrote:
> 
> My personal opinion is that the Contax G-series Biogons (21mm & 28mm) beat
> their Leica counterparts.  The Leica 35mm Aspherics beat the G-series 35mm
> Planar (in my opinion, the weakest of the 5 Zeiss lenses for the G2 I've
> used)
> hands down but it holds its own with the Leica 35 f/2.0 non-aspheric model
> (meaning no better, no worse -- both are somewhat soft in the corners wide
> open).  I'd rather have Leica's 50 f/2.0 than the G-series 45mm Planar by a
> very slim margin but I think that the G-series 90mm f/2.8 Sonnar easily
> beats
> the 90mm f/2.8 M-series from Leica.
>
If Contax had a body as easy (and silent) to focus as an M with the
metering and motordrive and fast flash sync as a G, we'd really have
something.  Having shot a hundred some rolls with a G1, I have grown to
love the optics and hate the camera.  The G2 is only marginally better
and just too SERVO for me.  Too bad.

donal
- -- 
Donal Philby
San Diego
http://www.donalphilby.com