Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 28 mm alternatives
From: Tony Chang <stchang@novice.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 19:28:21 -0500

>
>Are you thinking about getting the whole GR-1, or just the lens to bolt on 
>your Leica?  I have the camera, and am still getting used to it.  As a 
>point-and-shoot package, the GR-1 is quite appealing, and I've seen some 
>entirely acceptable photographs which were laid down by that lens;  but so 
>far, not one has had the visceral appeal of a decent example of imaging by 
>modern Leica glass.  This is as anecdotal and unscientific as it gets, of 
>course, and could just be the luck of the snapshooter's draw.
>
>Question: is performance at f/2.8 of any particular interest?  The newest M 
>28mm is unusually, improbably, impossibly good wide open.  The GR-1's
exposure 
>program, interestingly, jumps immediately from f/2.8 to f/4 at 
>still-difficult-to-handhold shutter speeds, stays there until the shutter 
>speeds get more sensible, then starts stopping down some more.  This may
tell 
>us something about what the GR-1's designers know about the lens...
>

I have enlarged a 16x20 Tri-X photo and I was amazed by the quality.  Not
only the pro shop did a great job on the enlargement, the lens quality on
GR-1 was just excellent.
It was an indoor photo where I set flash mode at f4.  I have framed the
photo in my living room.

> -Jeff
>
>
>
>