Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello all. Well, tomorrow's the big camera show in Buena Park and I love "hunting" around whether I need something or not. Here's my question. I have an M6 w/35mm f2 lens as well as an R4s with a 50mm Summicron, a 90mm f2.8 and a 135 f2.8. As far as quality goes, what is the true difference in quality between an 90mm M 2.8 lens and an R 90mm 2.8 lens. I raise the question because I'm debating on going for a second M lens and was thinking of a "90" but wanted to know what the quality differences are. As usual, thanks ahead of time. Sincerely, Gabe