Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have now looked up the prices. The 14167 M-R-adapter costs $200 new in Sweden, and the same dealer also has a mint 16464 for less than $100. Cheaper than to buy a 135/2.8-R lens. And I don't need the 16471 (only for close-up work), right? /Stefan >---------- >Fr=E5n: Marc James Small[SMTP:msmall@roanoke.infi.net] >Skickat: den 14 januari 1998 04:49 >Till: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Ang=E5ende: =C4Leica=C5 Tele-Elmar Lens Head on Viso > >Thanks, Marvin -- you are correct: both the 16464 and 16471 are = necessary. > >Argh. My Leica literature is buried away, but the chart for the Viso = III >as reprinted in Laney &al does, indeed, show that both are necessary. = I >was wrong! And I wasn't thinking. =20 > >Marc > > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > >