Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:28 PM 12/18/97 -0800, you wrote: >So Jim, if you have a remote setup that you prefocussed at freezing >temperatures, and are expecting to get a sharp picture after the sun hits >the lens, good luck! Unless the temperature/focus point curve puts these >two conditions on the same focus point, you won't get the sharp picture you >expect. That's a fact of life (and optics) that nobody has yet found a >solution for for general camera optics. It's akin to demanding that all >colors focus on the same plane, period. It just doesn't happen. > OK, I'll go along with the fact that temperature could indeed cause a focus shift. It makes sense. It would still piss me off on a $8000 lens. But actually, what I really objected to, was that the opinion is that long lenses focus past infinity just because of the temperature drift. This is not true. They focus past infinity so that a photographer, knowing the proper focusing process, can indeed critically focus on very distant objects with those very long lenses. My 350 Telyt (not a fluorite based lens) focuses a full half inch past infinity. This is NOT for temperature drift. Can you imagine the drift necessary to take up a half inch on the focusing ring? A half inch the other way is roughly 175 feet. Leica designers are smart enough to know that to achieve critical focus, you must yo-yo-in. Try yo-yo'ing in on the moon if your long lens does not have plenty of space past infinity. It came in very handy when photographing Hale-Bopp. Jim