Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alfred Breull writes: <<From my experience the 3.4/21 (1) balances contrasts far better with th= e = result of more rich and more pleasant b/w half/middle (?) tone rendition,= = (2) more pleasant out-of-focus rendition, (3) more rich and pronounced rendition of highlights (a) in low light, (b) in opposite (?) light (sun = directly into the lens), (4) more fine rendition of shawdow details (a) i= n low light (e.g. f 4, 1/60 400 ASA), (b) in opposite (?) light. = And, it's shape is more nice :) = Did I mention, that my SAs were more sharp also than the 2.8/21 Elmarit = (of a friend of a friend :) )? Alf>> Alf; Now THAT is an assessment! <s> How does one read Henning Wulff's 21mm AS= PH report? Michael =