Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Alf et al Thanks, Alf, for your very kind comments on my site and pictures. I am glad when visitors find my site interesting or stimulating and also when they give feedback because then I can improve things. I have added a couple more pictures today and hopefully this weekend I can add still more. Thanks for your tip about the thumbnails. I shall sort things out during the weekend to make it work more logically in terms of numbers of pics, etc. This is the first site I have worked on using HTML and I think I will continue tweeking it for some time to come until I am happy. Then I shall just add more and more pictures, soon of other subject matter too. Best wishes Harold - -----Original Message----- From: Alfred Breull <puma@hannover.sgh-net.de> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: 28 November, 1997 12:44 PM Subject: Re: Harrold's site/-s & Noctilux >Harold has his new site Netscape enabled, meanwhile, and I'm glad, because >he shows remarkable examples of the Noctilux's performance - very remarkable >examples! It's at < http://hgphoto.home.ml.org >. > >Almost all pix show musicians on the stage (and in action, nice shots!), >and gave me - as a permanent Noctilux grudger - a very persuading insight >in the Noctilux's both strongest abilities: the balance of strong/ extreme >contrasts and the revelation of shadow details, which are (almost) invisible >to the eye. Additionally, I'm very pleased that he demostrates the Noctilux's >abilities in that lot of fine (!) pictures. And, it's rather clever of you, >Harold, to show the performance of the 1.8/85 Nikkor also, but with daylight >film. So, all Nikon users will be looking for the M Leica (it means: not an >R Leica, LUGs, in case some BS filter don't work :) ). > >May I suggests, Harold, that you might switch the rank order of your pictures, >not much - just a little, and begin at least with a site which shows 2 or 3 >thumbnails. I was a little confused during your first 4 sites, why you show >a thumbnail (and a pic on the same site), although there was only 1 pic. > >But, that's nothing which interferes with your remarkable pictures. > >Alf > >