Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 02:37 AM 11/20/97 -0500, you wrote: > Patrick - The LUG has discussed their opinions of "bokeh" several > months ago ---- almost to the point of absurdity. Please refer back > and not bring the subject up again or many of us will just wear our > delete keys. If you so wish, I can capsulate all aspects in private > for you but puleeese don't bring it up again since when you talk of > "bokeh" ---no one is wrong and everyone is right, as it is subjective. > > Marvin >====================================================== Marvin, Not to be speaking for Patrick, but... I'm really sure that Patrick knows full well what he is doing. And I know that he has read and participated in all of the previous Bokeh stuff. The concept of Bokeh is truly interesting. You can tell the "nose-to-the-grindstone" scientific folks from the artsy fartsy folks. It's a great subject. A whole lot more interesting (to me) than Jupiter's, Zorki's, or Dorki's. But then again, they may be the Bokeh queens... So I have an open mind and will let the LUG educate me in areas that I no nothing about. Jim