Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry, Bob, I made a mistake - I didn't even know, that the 3.4/21 was available for the SL also. I just knew her as M lens. But, I agree to all of you: She's close to a little miracle. Thanks to all for the clarifying information. Have a nice weekend, Alf - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- At 15:30 15.11.1997 -0500, Bob (and many more) wrote: >The 21, 3.4 SA , which I was talking about, protruded deeply into the camera, ... or very similar.