Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The R3 uses silver batteries. kw >On Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 02:18:35 -0500 (EST) ChipZHZ@aol.com wrote: > >>R3- First Leica electronic based on Minolta XE-1. Spot metering and >>averaging. 35,600 black,4,250,chrome, 25,000 MOT. Both common. Mine >>developed meter problems shortly after purchase. Manual or auto >>(apeture priority?) Rather low resale value. > >The above raised my curiosity. In the KEH Camera Holiday '97 catalog, the >R3MOT's in similar condition are less than the R3's. I do recall the Minolta >XE-1 vintage 1975 or 1976 and at the time thought it was a very nice camera. >My questions are: > >1) Why might the R3MOT be selling for less than the R3 (at KEH anyway)? >2) Is it foolish to buy an R3 or R3MOT for mechanical reasons (is it not as >durable or mechanically reliable as other R's)? >3) The mercury battery problem. I assume the R3 family took mercury cells. >Does Wien make an air cell that replaces the mercury cell? >4) Regarding the R3MOT; it appears there is a winder and motor etc. >what would be a better choice? >5) Would choosing a camera body from the R3 family be a decent way >to get into the R system of lenses? >6) Finally, I assume the R3 and all subsequent R bodies use 3 cam lenses >to take advantage all possible exposure automation. Is this true? > >Any thoughts, opinions or information you care to share on the subject would >be most appreciated. > >Regards, > >Larry Zaks - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> <kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org>