Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim Brick wrote: <<< and it does not like focusing closer than its "designed" distance. On the other hand, the 180/2.8 new design, is bright, crisp-sharp, will take both 1.4x & 2x APO extenders, will focus close,>>>>>> Hi Jim, The two relevant reasons why I bought the 180 2.8 even though I had the 3.4 were the closer focusing ability and use of the 1.4 extender. There were too many times when I missed the tight shot I wanted due to the 3.4's inability to focus close and fill the frame. Sure if there was room to back-up obviously one did, but there were times I literally had my back up against the wall and trying to push myself into a few MM's thinner for the critical focus point. When I read an article about the 2.8 specs, it's closer focusing point and able to attach the 1.4 extender I immediately bought the 2.8. And I only sold them both off when I bought the Apo 70-180 2.8. And damn wouldn't you know, I have cursed selling that 180 2.8 a dozen times since, even though I'd be dead without the 70-180. The reason for that is simply, sometimes the convenience of the "lighter weight 180 2.8 lens" for handling in difficult situations. So if I come across a reasonable priced one some day I'll pick it up. And another thanks for Marc's comments on the 15mm 3.5. It truly is a very special magic lens once you learn how to make it work for you.:) And then look out world! :) ted