Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I don't see the point for a 24/2 or a 135/2 >(maybe I'm wrong, but I think that the market "niche" is to small) >but strongly support a 20-35/2,8 ASPH. >and also a 35-90/2,8 ASPH.-APO. I>nstead of that I think we have more chance to see =3D >a 24/2,8 ASPH. and a 21/2,8 ASPH. in the next months. >Lucien >BELGIUM Duane Birkey wrote: >Maybe part of Lucien's thoughts or something got lost in = >translation..... >What's the point of having a 50 Noctilux or a 35 Summilux? >Why doesn't everyone shoot with F/2.8 and f/4 lenses? You're right, my point is more about the market for a "LEICA" 24/2 or 135/2 than about the utility of them. = Lucien BELGIUM