Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: "Leica has filled about the only "hole"in the M lens line with the 24mm" Was: Bokeh
From: Lucien_vD <Lucien_vD@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 16:17:28 -0400
 
- - Paul wrote:

>The only thing I can see that might make sense is if someone made a lens=
 =

>that Leica doesn't offer. Now that Leica has filled about the only "hole=
" =

>in the M lens line with the 24mm, it would have to be something wider =

>than 21mm. Longer than 135 wouldn't make a lot of sense.

It is funny that you say that.
A few days ago I was wondering wich lens is missing in the M lens line.

A 16mm Hologon ?
A 21/2,8 and a 24/2,8 with goggles ? (like Tom Abrahamson 21mm)
A smaller 90/2 Summicron Apo ? (and lighter)

Lucien
BELGIUM