Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Off topic:help on enlarger
From: Jim Zietz <jzietz@unix1.sncc.lsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 08:19:08 -0500

>enlarger, still in good shape in spite of the dust: it's a Durst M600,
>capable of up to 6x6, but I'll use it only for 35mm.
>Anybody knows this italian brand and model? Any comment?
>Years ago I had pretty nice results, but the way to judge my work has
>now completely changed (that damn Leica).
>The lens is a Nikon 50/4:is the quality level acceptable?
>Do you, guys, think should be better to use a Leitz lens to be
>consistent with the camera ones?

As I have stated previously, I think the Durst enlargers are the best
available. I use the M605 (almost M6, so not so far off topic) and the
L1200. I'm not really familiar with the 600. I have a Focomat V35 and have
extensively used a Valoy II. I still prefer the Durst, set up with
anti-newton glass on top and a metal mask on the bottom.

I would recommend dumping the Nikon lens and getting a recent Rodenstock
Rodagon or Schneider Componon-S, preferably an apo version. They are
supposedly not really apochromatic, but they tend to be a bit sharper than
anything else available.