Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In einer eMail vom 19.09.1997 11:17:20, schreiben Sie: >Huh? Could you re-phrase that; the meaning isn't coming through. >-Charlie Sorry - my German is definitely better. 2nd attempt: Both lenses, the 1.4/35 Summilux ASPH and the 2/35 Summicron, "behave"/ perform completely different in the unsharp (out-of-focus) areas of a picture: It is my impression, that the Summilux's unsharpness is additionally increased, either as a special property of the one aspheric lens, or by an intended dis-correction or softening of the lens' out-of-focus performance by Leitz (to pronounce the in-focus sharpness, additionally). In the 30ies, Leitz did something similar with the 2/50 Summar, as Mark explained 2 or 3 weeks ago. And, as explained some days ago also, Leitz needs or likes to present some new 35 mm lens/-es, although the "old" Summicron is/ was great. Further, the Summilux is a high contrast lens (also) with the consequence, that each unsharp forground or background object, which has a high contrast by itself, is pronounced additionally by the lens' contrast properties, hence results as an unsharp light/dark blurr - which destroys or kills a pic. The Summicron performs completely different: The unsharpness of the Summicron is more gradually, not suddenly (as from the Summilux). You could still recognize an object, although it's positioned in the out-of-focus areas/ parts. Additionally, the contrast of the Summicron is moderate (in my mind), and lower than the contrast of the Summilux, which might result in a more pleasant impression (for the eye), even with high contrast backrounds. By the way, there is an additional difference between both lenses: While both lenses' sharpness is approximately equal up to ca 10 or 15 meters, the Summicron is more sharp at infinity than the Summilux. Hope, the 2nd attempt is ... eh, uhm ... more clear. Somehow. At least a little. Alf