Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, captyng wrote: > Has any of the European LUG members kept a copy of the Chasseur d'Images > "fiche technique" with the definition test of the last spherical version of > the Summicron 35mm f/2,0? Lucien? Pascal? Oddmund? I remember having seen > one maybe a year-or-so ago. Please answer privately. Many thanks. > > Gerard. > Having been the person responsible for lens tests on a major photography magazine in the U.S. from about 1959 to 1966 I would like to make a few observations. If you are concerned with wide-open f/2 on the early 35mm f/2 Summicron ( I own a bug-eye one) remember the following... Lens tests are performed ( I hope) on a tripod. When we make pictures with our lens wide-open at f/2 it's generally done hand-held and at a relatively slow shutter speed, such as 1/30 or 1/60 sec. Image results at slow shutter speeds are usually not as sharp as at high shutter speeds, such as 1/250 or 1/500 sec. I suspect that camera and/or subject shake have more to do with sharpness than the optical quality of the 35mm f/2 Summicron, vintage 1968. Another consideration is that tests are usually done on a flat plane. So when edges are not so sharp wide-open, it could be caused by curvature of field. But so what, I rarely use my Summicron to photograph flat subjects. People, scenes, happenings have depth. Shoot pictures, not lens test charts. This could be a reason for not buying the new high-priced fancy lenses. I paid about $175 for my 50mm f/2 DR Summicron just three or four years ago. Another wonderful lens....Ed Meyers