Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Di's Driver Drunken 1.75 prom. (was: Paparazzi ...)
From: Thomas Kachadurian <kach@freeway.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 23:08:21 -0400

Marc:

Sorry to be judgemental and vociferous. Only drunks trying to deny their
own drinking problems think that a blood alcohol level of .175 isn't
blasted. The driver was drunk. I don't give a wink about Lady Di, but no
one who is that intoxicated should be driving a car, even under the best of
conditions.

Tom

  At 02:29 PM 9/1/97 -0400, you wrote:
>To keep this in perspective, American readers should know that this is .175
>parts per thousand.  This is a high level, but not unwieldy:  a regular
>drinker should not have his or her reflexes too badly affected at this
>level, though a tyro alcoholic might well be staggering at .08.  It depends
>on a LOT of factors, not simply Blood Alcohol Content, though the US Jesus
>Freaks would have us so believe.
>
>Pray, let's not act like a bunch of vociferous and judgemental idiots. 
>
>Marc
>
>
>msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
>Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
>
>
>