Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Luggers, Is there anybody who has already some experience with the Elmarit M-asph. f 2.8/24 mm? And if so, why did you choose this lens and does it meet your expectations. I once read an article (Camera Magazine) where this lens was compared to it's R-counterpart. It was said that this about twenty year old R 24mm lens (almost) equals the new ASPH M-version. Can anybody confirm this? It's too bad that I couldn't find anything about this 24 ASPH M-lens on the, by me very appreciated, websight of Erwin Puts. Alexander Koning >> Dear Alexander, I have been using the 24/2,8 ASPH for 6 month, as well as having tried it last year at Photokina and later in Brighton, UK in November 96. It is a very good piece of glass. It is more of an evolutionary lens than a revolutionary lens. It has the same type of signature as a 21/2,8 Elmarit, but lacks the "snap" of the later version of the 21/3,4 Super-Angulon. Very even image across, slight edge softness at wide open ( negligible in all but the most stringent application). The finder suffers from the usual top mount finder problem, a/ it is not very precise and b/ it shows less than what appears on the neg and c/ it is clumsy. One day Leica will probably release a M6 with a high eyepoint finder that allows us to actually see the 28 mm frames or even the 24 frames in the finder, even if you wear glasses. I had a 21/3,4 and a 21/2,8 modified according to my design and put the goggles from the 35 Summicron on the lenses and had the mount modified to key in the 28 frames. The effect is a approx. mm frame in the cameras finder (on M6/M4P) and pretty close to 21mm on a M4 or M2. There is a mask in the finder for the M6/M4P that cuts in. The 24 is a perfect candidate for this conversion. I dont think that the 24 R comes close to the performance of the M 24 ASPH, at least not wide open, although I haven't used the R lens for a long time. It does focus closer than the M-lens, that's about the best I can say about it. I have only shot about 100-125 rolls with the 24 ASPH but so far I haven't had any problem with the lens that I can blame it for. In the beginning it took some time to get used to it, I kept thinking that it was a 21 and had some very close crops on it, but now it works fine and it is now part of my "travel" pack of lenses. Tom Abrahamsson