Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:55 AM 8/5/97 -0300, you wrote: >Ladies and Gentlemen of the LUG: > > 89 of the messages generated just during waking hours of this day >are from the Leica list. > >I humbly contend that this is getting out of hand. More than half the >messages should have been sent privately or were hopeless repeats of >repeats of repeats. > >If we can agree on anything, could we agree not to post what should be >personal messages to the whole list. And could you read what 5-25 others >have already posted on a subject and not repeat the exact same >information that adds nothing to the discussion and only clogs >mailboxes. > >If we all would be a bit more careful, the list will be a great deal >more interesting and efficient. > >Thank you. > >Fred Ward > Good post Fred. I have always advocated that a good e-mail list, with intelligent participates, will police itself. I to think that responding, ad nauseum, over and over, with the same information, is useless. HOWEVER... I have also discovered that some people have a continuous internet connection (me) while others may log on once a day to read and answer mail. This happens to me when I'm out of my office for the day. What happens is, as you are reading down the list and come upon something that you want to respond to, you do. Unfortunately, had you read the entire list of new mail you would have discovered that what you just responded to, has already been responded to, in exactly the same way several times. Possibly because of the same reason. Also, the internet has hiccups which will delay routes and cause ripples to echo around the world. This causes some mail to be late. So yes, I agree with you that everyone should be more careful and not respond in kind, to already responded to messages. But because it's the internet, well... sometimes it'll work and other times it won't. I think we all should be a little more responsible, perhaps read through all of the new mail before answering anything. I'll certainly try this. Jim