Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>The "R9 Stealth SLR" (as I will now call it ;-}) is a good idea; it could >have a stationary pellicle mirror and a moving meter mirror and be only a >little louder than the M6, as the RT is. The RT is quite a camera, and >(apparently) a lot quieter than the EOS 1N RS. I toyed with the idea of getting the 1nRS, but decided agianst it for several reasons. 1. It was explained to me that the mirror has to be kept as clean as a lens surface. I don't know about the rest of you, but the insides of my cameras tend to get very dusty just changing lenses. They say you are supposed to send the camera in to have the mirror cleaned because it is so fragile-this is something I did not want to have to bother with. 2. You lose 2/3 of a stop of light. Why have a 2.8 lens if the best you can get is nearly 4.0? 3. It sounds like you can see through the camera the same as in a rangefinder, well if shooting wide open this may be true, but if stopped down you will see the entire field of view dim when the aperature cranks down. Who needs 10 frames a second anyway, that is making movies-litterally. I ended up getting my M6 and lenses. Harrison McClary hmphoto@delphi.com http://people.delphi.com/hmphoto