Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 80/1.4 was the first R lens I purchased along with an R6 several years ago. I loved the focal length and the brightness of the R6 viewfinder with it. I traveled with it, took many slides with it, and was generally satisfied. Then I bought a Canon EOS1-n and the 85/1.8 lens. Just to see if the Canon stacked up, I did some serious comparative testing. The R lens was VERY soft from 1.4 to 2.8. Less light fall-off than the Canon, but unacceptably soft. Shocked I was -- also a little embarrassed since I had owned the lens for years and not noticed this problem in general shooting. I called Leica New Jersey. They said send it in. I did. They said they would send it to Germany for optical testing. They did and it failed their optical tests (it was mechanically fine). They offered me a new lens for about $500-$600. I said, how about the 100 APO? They said "fine". The APO is tack sharp as all have said -- even at 2.8. It is easier (i.e. slimmer) to hold than the 80.1.4. But -- I still like the 80 focal length better, the viewfinder was much brighter on the 80, and the 80 is a much faster lens. I guess I got a bad one, but still don't know how good a good 80/1.4 would be (relative to the 100 APO from, say, 2.8 to 8.0). By the way, I sold the EOS-1n. Good camera, great ergonomics. Sharp lenses, but lots of light fall off, and too much plastic. John McLeod