Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard wrote: <<<Perhaps with the 24mm, you can get good coverage but without that "wide angle look" and without distortion.>>>>>>> Well gee whiz Richard I guess I'll screw-up your photographic life and say, "Buy the 15mm R lens and put it on the R 7, 8,? camera and make sure you use it perfectly horizontal and vertical and you'll have the most incredible wide angle no distortion images you have ever seen. :) And if done well, you'll have a great picture and it wont look like a super wide angle shot. It'll just look bloody marvelous! :) And everyone will say, "how did you do that?" And you'll just smile and say, "Gee whiz, cause I'm good!" :) Now I don't want to cause you any stress after just acquiring the new M glass :) with this suggestion, but if you like wide angle this will freak you out. :) As far as the 28mm and the 24mm on the M, I guess it depends on how and where you are using either for the best effect. I use my 28mm far more on the R camera than the one I have for the M and will probably get rid of it and pick-up the new 21. As I've always had the 21, f3.4. Besides I've got a friend who wants a 21 and can't afford new, so I'll cut him a good deal for the 3.4 and possibly the M 28 and go for the 21 2.8. myself. Don't know if this has been of any help other than creating more confusion in your otherwise stable life. :) ted