Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 15 Jun 97, Alistair_Stewart_at_LC4001@cc wrote: > Dan, > > I've been religiously using the hood on my 35/1.4 ASPH, > having read somewhere that the first ASPHERIC 35/1.4 suffered > badly from flare. Now that summer has finally arrived in > Chicago, I can stop shooting 400, and will try some K64 in > bright sunlight without the hood to see what I get. > > > Does anyone else have experience in this. I'm chuckling, Alsitair, because I have exactly the same arrangement and when I want to unsnap the M6 Pouch from the Celia III, the problem exists. First and foremost, the 35/2.0 Summicron M is rather flare prone IF, like me, you shoot into a lot of sun. I sold it and bought the ASPH to get away from that problem. I can not speak on the original ASPHERIC, never having owned it, but the ASPH is an order of magnitude better in flare than the 35 Summicron, IMO. Haven't solved the problem of the ungainly hood when carrying only the M6 Pouch, except to stick in in my pocket and then take the time necessary to affix it if the upcoming photography is to be flare prone. I'll not be acceptable to "Gentleman's Quarterly", however, traipsing around in tight Sans-a-Belt slacks with that stupid hood protruding from the side pocket of my slacks. Also, AZ heat precludes leaving the M6 Pouch home and wearing a photo vest. My wife wonders what I'd do if I had a real problem to worry about. - -- Roger When a public offical accepts a gift, he dissolves the pearl of independence in the vinegar of obligation. -- Henry Fountain Ashurst