Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Thu, 12 Jun 97 01:22:50 EST Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA253372354; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 01:12:34 -0400 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1) id xma025191; Thu, 12 Jun 97 01:09:56 -0400 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA05711; Wed, 11 Jun 97 21:35:09 -0700 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA05705; Wed, 11 Jun 97 21:35:05 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA18804 for leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:35:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:35:02 -0400 (EDT) From: ChipZHZ@aol.com Message-Id: <970612003501_-429351305@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us I just bought a used two weeks ago and haven't tried it yet, but, from what I read prior to buying it, it definitely is excellent all the way around and is one best in a long line of great lenses......BAS gave it 100/100 "this allrounder guarantees exceptionally good imaging performance even at full apeture,......whether at full apeture or stopped down, it's imaging performance is so good in the entire focusing range that the lens is superb as a 100mm telelens...." Is it worth the added cost over that of say the 90 2.8? (that was the battle I had and apo won out...) Anybody with experience using? Ted? - -chip