Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
From: Postmaster@gatekeeper2.un.org (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 17:16:26 EST

User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined

 Original text follows 
 ----------------------------------------------
Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01)
	; Wed, 11 Jun 97 17:16:14 EST
Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA198883118; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 17:05:18 -0400
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1)
	id xma016053; Wed, 11 Jun 97 16:52:13 -0400
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA26521; Wed, 11 Jun 97 09:34:51 -0700
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA26509; Wed, 11 Jun 97 09:34:39 -0700
Received: from [200.26.47.34] by interlink.com.ar with
 SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 1.1.2); Wed, 11 Jun 1997 13:40:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Black or Chrome/21 or 24
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 13:45:36 -0300
X-Sender: fquintana@mail.interlink.com.ar
X-Mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0, March 15, 1997
From: Federico Quintana <fquintana@interlink.com.ar>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <1346086054-26583824@interlink.com.ar>
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

	All your replies about black/chrome choice have made me revert to my 
original decision on the black chrome M6.  I will be starting off with 
the 50 summicron, as I want to wait for the new 35 summicron aspherical.  
In the mean time I plan to go for the 90 elmarit and either 21 or new 24 
apsherical.  I recently read that the 24 is usable without the added 
finder, which I find very interesting.  My question, is: How much larger 
than the 28 mm markings, is the viewfinder of the M6? and how do the 21 
and 24 compare in general optical quality?

PS.  Lucien, thank-you for the "panda" info.

Federico Quintana 
Argentina