Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
From: Postmaster@gatekeeper2.un.org (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 20:39:26 EST

User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined

 Original text follows 
 ----------------------------------------------
Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01)
	; Wed, 11 Jun 97 20:39:12 EST
Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA120171393; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 19:23:14 -0400
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1)
	id xma011027; Wed, 11 Jun 97 19:13:47 -0400
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00160; Wed, 11 Jun 97 13:28:54 -0700
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00150; Wed, 11 Jun 97 13:28:39 -0700
Received: from hp24.lrz-muenchen.de by sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de; Wed, 11 Jun 97 22:28:27 +0200
Received: by hp24.lrz-muenchen.de
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA138240907; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:28:27 +0200
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:28:27 +0200 (METDST)
From: Rainer Mueller <uh3b207@hpmail.lrz-muenchen.de>
X-Sender: uh3b207@hp24.lrz-muenchen.de
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Noncoated filter
In-Reply-To: <970603225917_-128236552@emout18.mail.aol.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.91.970611222455.13760A-100000@hp24.lrz-muenchen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

Hello,

I yesterday bought a circular polarization filter
(Hama No. 725) and now I see that it is completely
uncoated. Is it less important for a filter to
be coated than for a lens? If not: why do they sell
such things at all? Should I bring it back to the
dealer?

Thanks for all answers,

Rainer Mueller, Munich, Germany