Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Wed, 11 Jun 97 18:13:25 EST Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA298536550; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:02:30 -0400 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1) id xma029368; Wed, 11 Jun 97 17:59:23 -0400 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA28950; Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:05:11 -0700 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA28942; Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:05:05 -0700 Received: (qmail 14143 invoked by uid 201); 11 Jun 1997 19:04:56 -0000 Received: from as51-8-ppp5.mtl.microtec.net (HELO dcardish.microtec.net) (205.236.248.177) by r2d2.microtec.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 1997 19:04:56 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970611140444.008165c0@pop.microtec.net> X-No-Archive: yes X-Sender: dcardish@pop.microtec.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 14:04:44 -0400 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> Subject: Re: Black or Chrome/21 or 24 In-Reply-To: <1346086054-26583824@interlink.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us At 01:45 PM 11-06-97 -0300, Federico Quintana wrote: > All your replies about black/chrome choice have made me revert to my >original decision on the black chrome M6. I will be starting off with >the 50 summicron, as I want to wait for the new 35 summicron aspherical. >In the mean time I plan to go for the 90 elmarit and either 21 or new 24 >apsherical. I recently read that the 24 is usable without the added >finder, which I find very interesting. My question, is: How much larger >than the 28 mm markings, is the viewfinder of the M6? and how do the 21 >and 24 compare in general optical quality? Except for the closest focusing distances, the viewfinder outlines show considerably more than what the lens actually covers in the M6. Thus it is possible that if you are using the 24mm lens, the 28mm viewfinder markings 'may' just provide the proper view. This is only a guess, and could be verified one way or the other by LUGers who actually have the lens. Dan C.