Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Wed, 11 Jun 97 17:40:12 EST Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA245994239; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 17:23:59 -0400 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1) id xma024130; Wed, 11 Jun 97 17:22:55 -0400 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA26389; Wed, 11 Jun 97 09:16:05 -0700 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA26383; Wed, 11 Jun 97 09:16:01 -0700 Received: by gatekeeper2.un.org; id MAA08024; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 12:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-in2.un.org(157.150.191.7) by gatekeeper2.un.org via smap (3.2) id xma008002; Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:21:48 -0400 Received: from ccMail by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id 9705118660.AA866056821; Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:20:21 EST Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:20:21 EST From: Postmaster@gatekeeper5.un.org (ccMail SMTPLINK) Message-Id: <9705118660.AA866056821@mail-in2.un.org> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Wed, 11 Jun 97 12:20:00 EST Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA242435050; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 12:04:10 -0400 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1) id xma007940; Wed, 11 Jun 97 11:05:47 -0400 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA22366; Wed, 11 Jun 97 05:30:49 -0700 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA22359; Wed, 11 Jun 97 05:30:43 -0700 Received: (qmail 28645 invoked by uid 201); 11 Jun 1997 12:30:41 -0000 Received: from as51-6-ppp16.mtl.microtec.net (HELO dcardish.microtec.net) (205.236.248.156) by r2d2.microtec.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 1997 12:30:41 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970611073037.00817680@pop.microtec.net> X-No-Archive: yes X-Sender: dcardish@pop.microtec.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:30:37 -0400 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> Subject: Re: Leica-Users List Digest V1 #503 In-Reply-To: <VA.00000033.0100f9e2@default> References: <9706100701.AA09430@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Eng-Suan wrote: > >>>> >You are correct to quote the MRBF of 322.6 rolls for your 4 bodies. What >I meant was if you take ANY RTS III randomly and use it *under the same >coditions* as you used for your 4 bodies, then the MRBF will be some >what more conservative. My calculation suggests it is at least 222 >rolls. (based on one-sided Chi-square distribution at 95% confidence >level.) Hmmm...my Minolta 9xi is past 500 rolls without any problems. It looks and operates as if it were new. Dan C.