Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From: "Lamberti" <dataface@ozemail.com.au> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 06:52:22 +1000 Hi, I have noticed that many of you own and use the Leica 2x Extender. I am contemplating purchasing one to use with my 50/2.0, as part of a lightweight travel kit. Aside of the loss of 2 stops, how well does this combination perform in contrast to a fixed focal tele, such as the 90/2.0 or 90/2.8. I used to have a 2X Extender-R, but traded it to a LUG member as part of a deal for a lens. I was satisfied with it optically (although any extender reduces acutance and I did see a reduction with this one), but I found I simply didn't think of using it often. I think that perhaps being in a situation where I didn't have a 135 with me I might have felt otherwise, but if I am using my R cameras I carry a backpack, and the 135 fits in it just fine. I suppose that one thing I found inconvenient when using the Extender-R with an R6.2 was that one cannot see the set aperture in the viewfinder when using the Extender-R with the R6.2 -- the set aperture is viewed through a little window below the protruding part of the pentaprism, but with the Extender in place, the aperture ring is not in its usual position. I don't know if automatic bodies might do this differently, perhaps using the meter coupling pin to read the set aperture for display in the finder. - -Patrick