Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/04/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:42 AM 4/22/97 -0700, you wrote: >Jim Brick wrote: >> You may use any Leicaflex or Leica R lens on any reflex body without >worry of damaging your camera or lens. > >This is not entirely true. For example current Extender-R 2x will not >mate with any Leicaflex, nor will the Vario-Elmar f/4.5 mate with anything >earlier than the SL2. > >John Barnabas > >john@ucs.com TEL: 602/966-8025 FAX: 602/966-8026 > > Thanks John, The following is the way I understand it works: The Extender-R 2x (11237) is the extender for the Leicaflex SL/SL2. Will work on the Leica-R but metering must be done at working aperture. Will fit the Leicaflex std but completely manual mode. The Extender-R 2x (11236) is the extender for the Leica-R. Blocked from mounting on any Leicaflex. The 75-200 Vario-Elmar f4.5 will indeed work on the Leicaflex SL which is earlier than the SL2. Work means meter and auto diaphragm. Unless you have specific experience to the contrary, it should also fit the Leicaflex std but must be used manually. Actually, those lenses that would cause damage on any older Leicaflex have a limiting block so that they cannot be mounted on the camera. The Vario-Elmar is not a blocked lens. If you put, for instance, a 90mm f2.8 Elmarit-R on any Leicaflex, you'll have to use it completely manually. You can have this and some other limited R-lenses converted for use on older Leicaflex cameras. The conversion is so the auto-diaphragm and meter (SL/SL2) will work. You cannot damage your Leicaflex by mounting any reflex lens. Those that COULD HAVE caused damage are blocked from mounting. In summary, pick-up ANY reflex lens and try to mount it on your reflex camera. If it does mount, you can take pictures through it without damaging your camera. Depending on the particular lens and the particular camera body, the auto functions may or may not work. This is basically what Leica preaches. If anyone has "ACTUAL EXPERIENCE" contrary to what I've just said, I, and I'm sure other people, would indeed like to hear about it. Jim