Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: to ted grant
From: Steven Blutter <sblutter@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 14:02:47 -0500

Ted Grant wrote:
> 
> Steven Blutter wrote:
> <<<to clarify, are you shooting the t-max 3200 rated right at 3200?
> i didn't check the developer times (i'm at my desk at work), but is your
> 9 1/2 mins. @ 75 over or under? also, those rapid agitations scare me with such
> sensitive material.>>>>
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> I use it at 3200 and the negs are on the mark for my printing with a Leica
> enlarger, Kodak Polymax or Elite paper and developer.
> 
> The temp of 75 degrees I use for both the 3200 and t-max 400 and the times are:
> 
> 3200....9 1/2 mins.
>  400....6
> 
> One of the things it took me a while to accept and learn to do was the agitation
> difference from Tri-x or other B&W films where we did it gently. However the
> T-max, I turn the tank up and down or lift and drop the reel rod continously for
> the first 15 secs and then at each 30 secs after, I reverse the tank three times
> quickly.
> 
> This made quite a difference in the film response after I accepted and did the
> Kodak recommendation for agitation. What works for me, may not work for others,
> but I use that development technique for the 400 when I rate it at 800, which is
> my normal practice when shooting indoors and I make 16X20 prints that some folks
> think I've used the zone system. :)
> 
> <<<the pics on your web sight don't seem to have required such speed...
> (especially liked the one of the guy reading the x-rays - well done!)>>>
> 
> The material in the book is shot on Tri-x in the beginning as T-max wasn't
> available and when Tmax came on the market I switched to 400 rated at 800 and
> processed as above directions. I only required 3200 in a few places and I
> believe after the fact I could still have got away with the 800.
> 
> Thanks for the compliment on the doctor looking at the x-ray film.
> 
> Too bad we couldn't get a copy of the book in the hands of all the LUGNUTS who
> are into B&W, as the reproductions are quite phenominal as were the prints for
> an exhibition in the National Art Gallery of Canada.
> 
> ted
> Victoria, Canada
> http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant

look forward to trying it - love high speed because i shoot a lot at
night...
steven