Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Message VS Medium--It Ain't the Camera
From: Ted Grant <75501.3002@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 08 Apr 97 17:08:39 EDT

Stephen Gandy wrote:

<<If a photog has to explain why one image is better than another, they are
wasting their time.  An image should stand by itself.  IF one isbetter than
another, the image should tell you, NOT the photog.>>>

G'day Stephen,
Right on my friend!  Too many photographers feel they have to explain their
photographs and in particular those who present their portfolio for assignment
work or a critique. It is better to just put your work down, keep your mouth
shut and let the viewer digest what you have given them to look at.

If the photographer babbles on, he detracts from the viewers concentration and
appreciation of his work.  Not to mention the babbling photog gives away that he
knows the photograph he's mouthing off about, isn't as great as it should or
could have been! And shouldn't have been in the portfolio in the first place!

Let the viewer make the first verbal contact when they are ready, then answer
the one question, then fall silent again. The first question or comment does not
open the door for the photographer to start making excuses for his work, as that
is the case if one goes on talking.

One can be nervous at presenting their work and that is a greater time to keep
quiet as you give away your nervousness and apprehention of how good your
photography is.  But this is something we who have "been there done that" had to
learn. :)

<<<Sorry folks, it ain't the camera, its the photographer.>>>>>>

This is one thing a great number of folks do not understand and that includes
many photographers who as you say, think they need a more expensive camera and
all their images will be great and they'll be happy ever after working for LIFE
or NAT. GEO! Ain't so folks.

The better glass makes for better recorded image on film, but if the guy holding
the camera can't see a picture to save his life, it isn't going to be any better
because he uses a Leica or throw away camera.

ted 
Victoria, Canada
http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant