Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Richard, I have used my Noctilux for over three years now almost constantly. At = the beginning I was wondering how much I would use the lens because of = the size and weight. Today I don't 'notice' it anymore, but I am a = quite tall and heavy fellow (too heavy if you aske my wife!) A year ago I used it in Hongkong and Beijing on market places and = temples late nights that has justified the money and pain that I have = invested in this beautiful lens. When I travel I carry my 21mm 2.8 and 90 mm Tele-Elmarit in my little = camera bag and keep the Noctilux on my M6. Go for it! BR Jorg Dear Fellow LugNuts, I have considered adding a new lens to my current "stable". The recent review of the Noctilux realy got me thinking about this specialty lens. = I have always wanted a fast 50mm. Certainly the Noctilux would solve that problem. My 50mm lenses have always been the Summicron and the Elmar. Small size and weight were always a consideration with a 50mm. That is = the reason I can walk around a city all day with a 35mm Summicron and not = need a chiropractic adjustment at the end of the day. The potential for = extreme small depth of field and color film intrigues me about the Noctiulx. I have never used an "exotic" lens on my Leica. =20 My question is this: Is the weight of this lens a problem if the camera = is to be carried around a bit? Does it change the entire balance of the = camera and cause the front of the camera to point down when carried? For those of you using a Noctilux - thanks for your answers. Sincerely, Richard Clompus, OD West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA