Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Ben > >This really isn't significant: the number I cited earlier comes from >Laney's LEICA COLLECTORS GUIDE and is repeated, I believe, in both Lager >and Van Hasbroeck. But then Laney uses 915251 in the error-ridden Leica >Pocket Book. I suspect other sources would have other numbers. > >Marc > Did I suggest that it was "significant"? I asked if it was a typo. Regards, Ben W. Holmes Boulder, CO USA bholmes@frii.com