Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: durability of high-tech equipment
From: Jack Campin <jack@purr.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:05:16 +0000

"David W. Almy" <dalmy@mindspring.com> wrote:
> OK, reality check. This argument flunks the laugh test. What percent of
> the products that you buy do you honestly expect to use for HALF A
> CENTURY?  Any?

The cameras I use most often are a Leica IIIA (1938) and (until it died a few
months ago) a Zeiss Super Ikonta (1935).  My girlfriend uses a Singer sewing
machine made in 1924 and SINGER STILL SUPPLIES THE PARTS, even for machines
made in the last century (if you think LUGnuts are retro freaks, just do a
web search for resources on antique sewing machines).  My flute and one of my
clarinets were made around 1880; both needed an overhaul that cost far more
than I paid for either, but the result was worth it.  I use woodworking tools
100 years old and drawing instruments owned by my great-grandfather.  There's
so little that can go wrong with my Overton low whistle that it won't need
anything beyond cleaning and dry storage to keep it playable for 1000 years.

I'd rather see my money go into keeping skilled repairmen in business than
in buying unnecessary replacements for potentially useful equipment that had
to be dumped in landfill.


> Do you seriously expect to be using your computer you are now using, in
> it's present form, even 50 WEEKS from now?

This one (a Mac Classic II) is four years old and I don't see why not.  The
one in the next room (a Mac Plus) just died after giving ten years' useful
service as a word processing engine.  Both had many software upgrades but no
change to the hardware - much like the Singer and the IIIA; their designers
didn't expect us to be using the same brands of film and thread for the
product's lifetime.


> Do YOU expect to be here, and still functional, 50 years from now?

No, but I'd rather leave future generations usable tools than a garbage
disposal problem; just as I regard archival stability as a reason for
using one photographic medium rather than another.  People 100 years from
now are every bit as important an audience for my pictures as anybody now
living.  Using C-41 would be throwing all my work in the trash.


- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
jack@purr.demon.co.uk  -  Jack Campin, 2 Haddington Place, Edinburgh EH7 4AE