Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alastair Firkin suggested that it might to possible to design a camera whose electronics could be upgraded. I don't think this is a viable possibility. He wrote " Some computers are now being designed to allow ongoing upgrades." Well, I my computer last summer with a new Intel baby-AT motherboard, and got the job done just in time. Today, Intel's motherboards are all ATX layout, so won't fit existing cases. For better or for worse, the electronics industry is living in the age of the "throw-away society". Take the example of the Leica R3. I asked my local dealer why R3s were so cheap compared with SL2s. He suggested that the problem was because the electronics assembly in the R3 was getting toward the end of its life. "If it keeps working, it's a cheap route into R photography - if it fails, all you can do is bin it." Here's a camera around 20 years old which needs an electronics retrofit, but no-one seriously expects Leica to offer one. Less than 50,000 were made. If we assume 10,000 have been scrapped, and another 10,000 are being used as "hack" cameras and will be scrapped when they break down, then around 30,000 are in the potential market for a retrofit. If we assume that 1/3 of users are prepared to consider an electronics retrofit, that brings the potential market down to 10,000. Faced with Leica service prices, how many owners would decide to pay up and modernise their cameras. 5,000? 2,000? 1,000? It would not be economic to design new electronics and tool up for production for such a small market. OK, so I've deliberately picked the worst case scenario to make my case, but I wonder how large a production run would be needed to make a retrofit worth while. Could such a retrofit exploit existing components such as integrated circuits, or would most of the parts need to be custom-designed? Perhaps a LUG member who works the the electronics industry could enlighten us. Someone made the observation that the military retrofit their electronic systems. How here I'm on safe grounds, given that I'm the managing editor of a magazine devoted to this very topic. Where its a matter of adding a new "black box" or simple replacement of one "black box" with another, modernisation takes place. But in photographic terms, that's the equivalent of buying an additional lens or having your shutter curtains replaced. When you start to talk about custom-designing an entire subsystem to replace another, many users look at the potential costs and rapidly loose interest. Doug Richardson